Sunday, January 3, 2016

A632.6.3.RB_MedleyKim_Conflict's_High_Price

            
Conflict's High Price


             Levine’s (2009) “Cycle of Resolution” begins with an attitude founded upon the “Ten Principles”:
1.     Believing in Abundance
2.     Creating Partnership
3.     Being Creative
4.     Fostering Sustainable Collaboration
5.     Becoming Open
6.     Forming Long-Term Collaboration
7.     Relying on Feelings and Intuition
8.     Disclosing Information and Feelings
9.     Learning Throughout the Resolution Process
10.  Becoming ResponseAble (p. vii – viii).

Levine (2009) states, “The attitude is developed by listening, sharing concerns, and knowing there is an agreement waiting to be discovered” (p. 109). Further understanding of conflict is provided by Hoch, Kunreuther, and Gunther (2001) as they present observations and discussions about framing and how different frames can lead to conflict. What began as a task that should have been a fun process, led to an adversarial position; and, as Levine (2009) notes, there were not any winners from the Christmas party planning team for American Pioneer Life Insurance.

            As our volunteer team began the process of planning our company’s first Christmas party, we truly believed there was abundance, “enough” for all “to get what they want” (Levine, 2009, p. 47). We were a team of six, including the Director of Human Resources. The abundance of creativity and money were present as we started; however, as we began to focus on the entertainment aspect of the event, the creative partnership soon deteriorated into a group that was wasting resources (Levine, 2009). The meetings that took place to discuss the pros and cons of either a band or a disc jockey resulted in a happy team who looked forward to meetings to an irritated team who saw the rehash of arguments as a waste of time; time better spent on company work. The continuity of happy collaboration that once permeated the group had been replaced by painful emotions held at bay (Levine, 2009). We had held numerous sessions wherein creative solutions were discussed, offered, and attempts to regain collaborative footing were made repeatedly. Each of us took turns telling our stories and why we either supported or opposed the entertainment options. In the end, instead of conflict resolution leading to a stronger team, as Levine (2010) observes; our team was dissolved. The HR Director believed the issues would somehow go away if the team was no longer in place. Unfortunately, all of the concerns came to fruition the night of the party.

            Levine (2009) states we become “responseABLE” by dealing with “internal and external conflict” (p. 104). Because our director had failed to deal with her own conflict regarding an overwhelming support for a disc jockey, our conflict resulted in a “gnawing effect”, termed “internal chatter” that led to physical, emotional, and monetary costs (Levine, 2009, p. 4). Unlike the beautiful result of conflict in nature that Levine (2010) uses to demonstrate the positive side of conflict, our group learned first-hand of the four sources of conflict: observations, interpretations, feelings, and needs discussed by Levine and presented by Jerry Wagner (2015) and the costs of unresolved conflict.

            Shortly after the Christmas party, the president fired the director. He had been embarrassed at his own company party for which significant amounts of money and other resources had been allocated. Employees, who had been surveyed for their preferences, were disappointed as few of the items they indicated as preferred were realized at the party. All of the energy and emotion the team had invested before it was dissolved would never be recovered. It was a project that should have been fun. It should have been a time for six fellow employees to come together and listen to their respective departments in order to provide an end of the year celebration worthy of the hard work that had taken place throughout the company. Had our director used just half of the ten principles, the first party would have been one to set the standards as opposed to one that was forgotten before it began. Instead of dissolving the team, we could have rotated new members each year so more could learn how to plan company events. Looking back, I believe most of us were reticent to be more open with our director. Perhaps we feared some type of reprisal, I’m not sure; but, had we been a bit more unified as a group and maybe if we would have gone over her head, the results would have been better. Twenty-twenty hindsight can be a useful tool if you take the lessons learned and apply them in the future. Since that time, of the ten principles Levine (2009) lists, “believing in abundance…, being creative…, and becoming open” are new ways of thinking that have helped me avoid such unresolved conflict, as an individual and as a team member.


References
Hoch, S.J., Kunreuther, H.C., & Gunther, R.E. (2001). Wharton on Making Decisions.
            Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Jerry Wagner. (2015, April 17). Stewart Levine. [Video file]. Retrieved from
Levine, S. (2009). Getting to Resolution: Turning Conflict into Collaboration. San
            Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.
Levine, S. (2010). Powerful Collaborations: Building High Performance Teams,
            Partnerships & Marriages. [PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved from



No comments:

Post a Comment