Sunday, February 28, 2016

A630.7.4.RB_MedleyKim_Mastering the Art of Change

Mastering the Art of Change
            Mastering the Art of Corporate Reinvention (2000), hosted by Jeff Greenfield, Senior Analyst for CNN, showcases two former chief executives, Gordon Bethune and Michael Bonsignore, of Continental Airlines and Honeywell, respectively. During the discussion, Greenfield describes the situation facing Bonsignore at Honeywell as a “corporate culture dilemma”; however, Bonsignore is quick to dismiss the characterization of “dilemma” and replace it with as a culture facing a “challenge” (Mastering, 2000). In order to understand why this push back from the former chief executive office is important in assessing his time as CEO, one must first look at the two men before they reached the top of the corporate ladder.
            Before soaring to the top of Continental Airlines, Gordon Bethune’s first encounter with planes came with his dad’s crop duster, along with his father’s urging for Bethune to become a pilot, an urging so rejected by Bethune, he literally left home to join the Navy. Bethune dropped out of high school, joined the Navy, later attained his high school diploma, and attended the “Advanced Management Program” at Harvard’s Business School. While in the Navy, the results of his aptitude testing led to more school, which led to a job as an electronics mechanic, which eventually led to a position as the supervisor of the night shift (Mastering, 2000). Here, Bethune learns it is much easier to work with people when they like you and when people are made to feel they are an integral part of the organization, by a leader, it is much easier to lead change (Mastering, 2000). Upon leaving the Navy, his experience of prepping planes for the Navy led him to jobs with Brannon, Western, Piedmont, and Boeing; during which he received his pilot’s license, headed Boeing’s customer service, and headed the divisions for and learned to fly Boeing’s 737 and 757 jets (Mastering, 2000). When he was recruited by Continental Airlines in 1994, he had a diverse background in the airline industry.
            Unlike Bethune, Bonsignore had attending the Naval Academy at Annapolis as his single focus, which he accomplished. He began his career with Honeywell upon his exit from the Navy (Mastering, 2000). Honeywell is a company, originally headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota, with a history that spans more than a century (Mastering, 2000). As Bonsignore states, “I’d been with the company for eighteen years before I went to Minnesota for the first time” (Mastering, 2000). He continues, “I was really a product of the colonial part of Honeywell… not terribly steeped in the corporate culture” (Mastering, 2000). Bonsignore’s exodus from Minnesota did not come until Honeywell merged with Allied-Signal in 1999 and moved its operations to Morristown, New Jersey (Mastering, 2000). Bonsignore had been named as Honeywell’s CEO in 1993 and kept his title and position through the merger (Mastering, 2000). By the year 2000, Bonsignore had been with Honeywell for thirty years (Mastering, 2000). The way in which each man approached the challenge of change differs just as uniquely as do their backgrounds.
            By viewing the introductory videos for each CEO, Greenfield is able to demonstrate how each man approached change. Bethune, as noted by the narration, works the crowd at George Bush Intercontinental Airport in Houston, whether cameras are rolling or not, as if he was “running for governor” (Mastering, 2000). He is seen engaging with both customers and employees, while offering words of encouragement for a job well done. Bonsignore observes one of Bethune’s greatest strengths is his “candor”, his ability for being able to present the “unvarnished truth” (Mastering, 2000). Given Bethune was faced with what Greenfield characterized as an opportunity that should have been met with “deepest sympathies” rather than congratulations, it can be argued this strength is what allowed Bethune to, within a year’s time, take a $200 million loss and a company “on the verge of bankruptcy” and transform it “from worst to first” (Mastering, 2000).
            By contrast, Bonsignore’s introductory video portrays him as a CEO returning to his old neighborhood and seeking to “regain the golden touch” that allowed him to transform the original Honeywell during the early 1990s (Mastering, 2000). He has given $5 million as “seed money” for a housing project, Portland Place, designed to improve the “troubled” Phillips Neighborhood of Minneapolis (Mastering, 2000). The personable style of Bethune is noticeable different than the seemingly staged visits, average one to two times per week, of Bonsignore. Portland Place homes feature traditional Honeywell products like thermostats and alarm systems; but, the newly merged company is now described as a “diversified industrial conglomerate” with 40% of its business devoted to commercial aerospace and 40% of its revenues realized through service contracts (Mastering, 2000). Whereas Bethune wants to listen to what the public wants and then set about giving them just that; Bonsignore’s main priority is “global expansion” (Mastering, 2000). Bethune seeks to facilitate change by giving employees buy in. He allowed the men and women who prep the planes to have input with airline scheduling. Each time Continental hit its well-articulated goals of being first in customer service categories, employees were rewarded $100; and, still awarded $65 if second place was reached (Mastering, 2000). Perfect attendance was even rewarded through twice a year drawings for a new Ford Explorer (Mastering, 2000). Bonsignore, when asked by Greenfield, how he dealt with the workers during the Bendix Brakes recall and how the workers felt, avoids the question and turns the discussion to public safety and technological talk regarding how the brakes failed (Mastering, 2000). Bethune’s management philosophy is clear, “Happy employees do a better job for the customer which in turn boosts the bottom line” (Mastering, 2000). Perhaps this is why Bonsignore, after one year post merging and maintaining his position as CEO, is still charting a course for change while Bethune has realized a complete turnaround and is experiencing profits (Mastering, 2000).
            Bonsignore believes he has set clear goals: delighted customers, profitable growth, and leadership and control; yet, these are subjective at best. Unfortunately, these are the goals from which the Bonsignore’s “Day One” decree flowed, “The new Honeywell will not be, not be, a derivative of the old Honeywell or old Allied-Signal” (Mastering, 2000). As he continues, he states, “We will compensate and reward employees who look for the best practices from both to create a new culture and we will punish those who don’t” (Mastering, 2000). Later, Professor Alan Lynn asks how each inspires trust and loyalty with their workers and whether or not rewarding employees was more important or if building a sense of team work was preferred (Mastering, 2000). Bethune’s answer is passionate and likens the interconnection of rewards and team building to that of asking “Who’s in the huddle?” at a football game (Mastering, 2000). Bonsignore responds in a corporate, calculating manner; and, while he states rewards and teams go together, his actions belie his words.
            By the summer of 2000, Honeywell’s lofty growth predictions failed for two quarters. When asked by Greenfield, Bonsignore admits Honeywell had been “caught up in merger mania and all the euphoria associated with bringing two companies together” (Mastering, 2000). They had underestimated the task of completing the integration of Honeywell and Allied-Signal, a $26 billion merger (Mastering, 2000). When Bethune is asked to assess Bonsignore, he states Bonsignore “exudes confidence”, knows what drives the business, and possesses incredible organizational abilities; qualities which assure things are done right and which define a manager, not a leader (Mastering, 2000). Bethune, as CEO of Continental, is one of Honeywell’s largest customers and sits on the board of Honeywell. He used quantitative expectations and measurable so his employees had a clear understanding of how to get from point A to point B; Bonsignore’s goals were subjective at best (Mastering, 2000).
            Brown (2011) lists: advocates of change, degree of change, time frame, impact on culture, and evaluation of change as factors that must be considered in order for change, necessary for survival, to succeed. The degree of change at Honeywell was extreme. The move from Minnesota to New Jersey impacted 11,000 workers. An edict was given to a company with history than spans more than a century; it would not be a derivative of its former self, neither would resemble Allied-Signal. What was the image for the new culture? Bonsignore asks employees to identify best practices; yet, guidelines for doing so are scant; however, punishment is promised for those who fail. Bonsignore observes Honeywell had taken its “success for granted” and that it needed a “kick in the pants”; however, he later admits the merger and the projected earnings per share predictions were “over ambitious”, a failure to communicate took place, and three weeks lapsed before reasons were presented to Wall Street as to why Honeywell missed its predicted revenues (Mastering, 2000). Honeywell lacked a clear vision, a climate favorable for change, effective communications, a positive rewards system, participation of its workers, and leadership from its CEO who seemed more concerned with change and how it benefited him, personally, and less concerned with his growing difficulty in speaking the language of Honeywell’s programmers and who was fast approaching the “Jurassic Park” period of ten years he himself had set as a tenure for CEOs (Mastering, 2000). It is with little wonder and amazement a quick Google search returns the predictable change for Honeywell along with a subsequent article by Gilpin (2001); Bonsignore resigns.



References
Brown, D.R. (2011). An Experiential Approach to Organization Development. (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Gilpin, K.N. (2001, July 4). Honeywell Regroups as Chief Resigns. In Business The New York        Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2001/07/04/business/honeywell-  regroups-as-chief-resigns.html

Mastering the art of corporate reinvention [Video file]. (2000). In Films On Demand. Retrieved        February 28, 2016, from fod.infobase.com/PortalPlaylists.aspx?wID=-1&xtid=30238

No comments:

Post a Comment