Showing posts with label change. Show all posts
Showing posts with label change. Show all posts

Sunday, February 28, 2016

A630.7.4.RB_MedleyKim_Mastering the Art of Change

Mastering the Art of Change
            Mastering the Art of Corporate Reinvention (2000), hosted by Jeff Greenfield, Senior Analyst for CNN, showcases two former chief executives, Gordon Bethune and Michael Bonsignore, of Continental Airlines and Honeywell, respectively. During the discussion, Greenfield describes the situation facing Bonsignore at Honeywell as a “corporate culture dilemma”; however, Bonsignore is quick to dismiss the characterization of “dilemma” and replace it with as a culture facing a “challenge” (Mastering, 2000). In order to understand why this push back from the former chief executive office is important in assessing his time as CEO, one must first look at the two men before they reached the top of the corporate ladder.
            Before soaring to the top of Continental Airlines, Gordon Bethune’s first encounter with planes came with his dad’s crop duster, along with his father’s urging for Bethune to become a pilot, an urging so rejected by Bethune, he literally left home to join the Navy. Bethune dropped out of high school, joined the Navy, later attained his high school diploma, and attended the “Advanced Management Program” at Harvard’s Business School. While in the Navy, the results of his aptitude testing led to more school, which led to a job as an electronics mechanic, which eventually led to a position as the supervisor of the night shift (Mastering, 2000). Here, Bethune learns it is much easier to work with people when they like you and when people are made to feel they are an integral part of the organization, by a leader, it is much easier to lead change (Mastering, 2000). Upon leaving the Navy, his experience of prepping planes for the Navy led him to jobs with Brannon, Western, Piedmont, and Boeing; during which he received his pilot’s license, headed Boeing’s customer service, and headed the divisions for and learned to fly Boeing’s 737 and 757 jets (Mastering, 2000). When he was recruited by Continental Airlines in 1994, he had a diverse background in the airline industry.
            Unlike Bethune, Bonsignore had attending the Naval Academy at Annapolis as his single focus, which he accomplished. He began his career with Honeywell upon his exit from the Navy (Mastering, 2000). Honeywell is a company, originally headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota, with a history that spans more than a century (Mastering, 2000). As Bonsignore states, “I’d been with the company for eighteen years before I went to Minnesota for the first time” (Mastering, 2000). He continues, “I was really a product of the colonial part of Honeywell… not terribly steeped in the corporate culture” (Mastering, 2000). Bonsignore’s exodus from Minnesota did not come until Honeywell merged with Allied-Signal in 1999 and moved its operations to Morristown, New Jersey (Mastering, 2000). Bonsignore had been named as Honeywell’s CEO in 1993 and kept his title and position through the merger (Mastering, 2000). By the year 2000, Bonsignore had been with Honeywell for thirty years (Mastering, 2000). The way in which each man approached the challenge of change differs just as uniquely as do their backgrounds.
            By viewing the introductory videos for each CEO, Greenfield is able to demonstrate how each man approached change. Bethune, as noted by the narration, works the crowd at George Bush Intercontinental Airport in Houston, whether cameras are rolling or not, as if he was “running for governor” (Mastering, 2000). He is seen engaging with both customers and employees, while offering words of encouragement for a job well done. Bonsignore observes one of Bethune’s greatest strengths is his “candor”, his ability for being able to present the “unvarnished truth” (Mastering, 2000). Given Bethune was faced with what Greenfield characterized as an opportunity that should have been met with “deepest sympathies” rather than congratulations, it can be argued this strength is what allowed Bethune to, within a year’s time, take a $200 million loss and a company “on the verge of bankruptcy” and transform it “from worst to first” (Mastering, 2000).
            By contrast, Bonsignore’s introductory video portrays him as a CEO returning to his old neighborhood and seeking to “regain the golden touch” that allowed him to transform the original Honeywell during the early 1990s (Mastering, 2000). He has given $5 million as “seed money” for a housing project, Portland Place, designed to improve the “troubled” Phillips Neighborhood of Minneapolis (Mastering, 2000). The personable style of Bethune is noticeable different than the seemingly staged visits, average one to two times per week, of Bonsignore. Portland Place homes feature traditional Honeywell products like thermostats and alarm systems; but, the newly merged company is now described as a “diversified industrial conglomerate” with 40% of its business devoted to commercial aerospace and 40% of its revenues realized through service contracts (Mastering, 2000). Whereas Bethune wants to listen to what the public wants and then set about giving them just that; Bonsignore’s main priority is “global expansion” (Mastering, 2000). Bethune seeks to facilitate change by giving employees buy in. He allowed the men and women who prep the planes to have input with airline scheduling. Each time Continental hit its well-articulated goals of being first in customer service categories, employees were rewarded $100; and, still awarded $65 if second place was reached (Mastering, 2000). Perfect attendance was even rewarded through twice a year drawings for a new Ford Explorer (Mastering, 2000). Bonsignore, when asked by Greenfield, how he dealt with the workers during the Bendix Brakes recall and how the workers felt, avoids the question and turns the discussion to public safety and technological talk regarding how the brakes failed (Mastering, 2000). Bethune’s management philosophy is clear, “Happy employees do a better job for the customer which in turn boosts the bottom line” (Mastering, 2000). Perhaps this is why Bonsignore, after one year post merging and maintaining his position as CEO, is still charting a course for change while Bethune has realized a complete turnaround and is experiencing profits (Mastering, 2000).
            Bonsignore believes he has set clear goals: delighted customers, profitable growth, and leadership and control; yet, these are subjective at best. Unfortunately, these are the goals from which the Bonsignore’s “Day One” decree flowed, “The new Honeywell will not be, not be, a derivative of the old Honeywell or old Allied-Signal” (Mastering, 2000). As he continues, he states, “We will compensate and reward employees who look for the best practices from both to create a new culture and we will punish those who don’t” (Mastering, 2000). Later, Professor Alan Lynn asks how each inspires trust and loyalty with their workers and whether or not rewarding employees was more important or if building a sense of team work was preferred (Mastering, 2000). Bethune’s answer is passionate and likens the interconnection of rewards and team building to that of asking “Who’s in the huddle?” at a football game (Mastering, 2000). Bonsignore responds in a corporate, calculating manner; and, while he states rewards and teams go together, his actions belie his words.
            By the summer of 2000, Honeywell’s lofty growth predictions failed for two quarters. When asked by Greenfield, Bonsignore admits Honeywell had been “caught up in merger mania and all the euphoria associated with bringing two companies together” (Mastering, 2000). They had underestimated the task of completing the integration of Honeywell and Allied-Signal, a $26 billion merger (Mastering, 2000). When Bethune is asked to assess Bonsignore, he states Bonsignore “exudes confidence”, knows what drives the business, and possesses incredible organizational abilities; qualities which assure things are done right and which define a manager, not a leader (Mastering, 2000). Bethune, as CEO of Continental, is one of Honeywell’s largest customers and sits on the board of Honeywell. He used quantitative expectations and measurable so his employees had a clear understanding of how to get from point A to point B; Bonsignore’s goals were subjective at best (Mastering, 2000).
            Brown (2011) lists: advocates of change, degree of change, time frame, impact on culture, and evaluation of change as factors that must be considered in order for change, necessary for survival, to succeed. The degree of change at Honeywell was extreme. The move from Minnesota to New Jersey impacted 11,000 workers. An edict was given to a company with history than spans more than a century; it would not be a derivative of its former self, neither would resemble Allied-Signal. What was the image for the new culture? Bonsignore asks employees to identify best practices; yet, guidelines for doing so are scant; however, punishment is promised for those who fail. Bonsignore observes Honeywell had taken its “success for granted” and that it needed a “kick in the pants”; however, he later admits the merger and the projected earnings per share predictions were “over ambitious”, a failure to communicate took place, and three weeks lapsed before reasons were presented to Wall Street as to why Honeywell missed its predicted revenues (Mastering, 2000). Honeywell lacked a clear vision, a climate favorable for change, effective communications, a positive rewards system, participation of its workers, and leadership from its CEO who seemed more concerned with change and how it benefited him, personally, and less concerned with his growing difficulty in speaking the language of Honeywell’s programmers and who was fast approaching the “Jurassic Park” period of ten years he himself had set as a tenure for CEOs (Mastering, 2000). It is with little wonder and amazement a quick Google search returns the predictable change for Honeywell along with a subsequent article by Gilpin (2001); Bonsignore resigns.



References
Brown, D.R. (2011). An Experiential Approach to Organization Development. (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Gilpin, K.N. (2001, July 4). Honeywell Regroups as Chief Resigns. In Business The New York        Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2001/07/04/business/honeywell-  regroups-as-chief-resigns.html

Mastering the art of corporate reinvention [Video file]. (2000). In Films On Demand. Retrieved        February 28, 2016, from fod.infobase.com/PortalPlaylists.aspx?wID=-1&xtid=30238

Sunday, February 21, 2016

A630.6.4.RB_MedleyKim_A Tribe of Local Santas

A Tribe of Local Santas
            It began with an image of a mother and her two children, one prominently displayed by Christmas Come True (2015), sitting outside a local business, baby stroller parked, and holding three cardboard signs that read, “Homeless, God Bless, Homeless, Please Help, and God Bless”. It has grown to into a movement that, according to Observer Staff (2015), has helped more than “96 families, with 295 children” benefit from and enjoy a “Christmas dinner, new clothing, gifts, and Christmas stockings filled with personal hygiene items”. Seth Godin, in his presentation before TED2009 (2009), defines tribes as those who lead and connect people and ideas. Nadine King, Christmas Come True’s tribal leader, saw “a piece of the status quo” (TED2009, 2009) in Flagler County, wherein the “average income for over 5,600 Flagler County residents” fell below $21,000 and the annual poverty rate of $23,050, and decided to make a change by leading (Christmas Come True, 2015). What if she had adopted excuses rather than “finding true believers” in order to start and expand her movement (TED2009, 2009)?

            Watkins’ (2011) presentation looks at “50 Reason Not to Change!”. The concept of change is imagined as a process wherein a door of imagination, once unlocked, opens to a “land of both shadows and substance of things and ideas you just crossed over” only to reach “The Twilight Zone” (Watkins, 2011). Excuses such as: “too much trouble”, “it can’t be done”, it’s impossible” , and “it’s not my job” are but a few King could have easily adopted and moved on with her life while simply observing the plethora of cardboard signs held by the homeless that span the populous of Flagler County (Watkins, 2011). We’ve all had those moments. An immediate “I can’t” comes to mind. I learned early, from my grandmother, an old Southern saying, “can’t never could do anything except stick in the mud and holler for help”. I used to ponder its meaning; but, now, I understand and have so for years. The late Jiddu Krishnamurti queries what keeps us, as humans, from change (as cited in Watkins, 2011). Citing that which will happen if we fail to change, becoming nationalistic, tribal, insular, isolated, without relationships, and constant warring; Krishnamurti observes it is either our superficiality, our immediate need to have our satisfactions met, or a simple lack of caring that prevents us from change (Watkins, 2011). Yet, he concludes that “life is one global unity movement” (as cited in Watkins, 2011); and, this explains Godin’s tribal theory (TED2009, 2009).

            As Godin observes, making change by leading means the leader cannot abide by the status quo (TED2009, 2009). King states because she had seen “so many families suffer”, she decided to upset the status quo of simply nodding and walking by families holding cardboard signs by connecting retailers and services in order to lead a movement that has reached more than “484 families (with 1373 children)” in a short span of just seven years (Christmas Come True, 2015). She didn’t need the entire community to bring about change. She accomplishes her achievements through volunteers of “true believers” who are “not forced” ; but, “want to connect” with others in order to address the needs of families in her community (TED2009, 2009). Like King, the word “No” has become less and less a part of my own vocabulary. "Why" has taken its place, particularly when change is resisted. Why is it too much trouble? Why can't it be done? Why is it impossible? Why is it not my job? Asking why accomplishes so much more than saying "No". Overcoming any negative begins by replacing the negative with a positive. No we shouldn’t, becomes Yes, we can. When this attitude is adopted rather than resisted, we find we haven’t crossed into the Twilight Zone; rather we have a road that allows us to challenge, create a culture, connect, and commit to a movement that brings something as simple as Christmas Come True into the lives of many.



References
Christmas Come True. (2015). Our Christmas Giving Project. Retrieved from
            http://christmascometrue.org/
Observer Staff. (2015, Oct. 28). Flagler residents and businesses help Christmas Come
            True shine During Make a Difference Day. Palm Coast Observer. Retrieved
TED2009. (2009, Feb.). Seth Godin: The tribes we lead. [Video file]. Retrieved from
Watkins, D. (2011, Aug. 24). 50 Reasons Not to Change!. [Video file]. Retrieved from


Sunday, August 30, 2015

A521.3.4.RB_MedleyKim_Turning_Points

Turning Points
          Denning (2011) refers to life’s turning points as “a fruitful source” for stories and as “moments of disruption when some incident gives us a glimpse of the regions of deeper feelings” (p. 100). It is these deeper feelings, and the subsequent movement from the quadrants, identified by McKay, Davis, and Fanning (2009) as the Unknown, Blind, and Hidden Self, to the Open Self that allows for and leads to self-disclosure. Such self-proclamations help to establish one’s credibility by shoring the foundations of trustworthiness, expertise, goodwill, and dynamism, considered to be the four pillars by Whalen (2007). The entire process combines to help leaders enhance their ability to see moods and feelings in others, direct emotions and behavior “appropriate for the situation”, resist impulsivity, and understand “one’s own moods and emotions”, a competency identified by Yukl (2013) as “emotional intelligence” (p. 151). Often times, turning points are found in stories from our childhood; but, as Denning (2011) notes the “resulting life story is usually a mix” (p. 98).
          The mind is truly a beautiful creation. It contains voluminous albums of memories, complete with that snapshot seared into our most revered remembrances. Like a modern day computer, they remain stored and are easily accessible whenever the need arises. Denning (2011) cautions storytellers to remain “authentic” and offer examples that allow the audience a glimpse of one’s “inner conviction” (p. 97). Such examples answer the questions asked in the minds of audiences. Stories provide insight as to who we are and how we “may act in the future” (Denning, 2011, p. 93). Two such stories come to mind as I think how best to convey how I behave and feel about teams in the workplace.
          I was still in junior high school, Deltona Junior High School to be specific. It was seventh grade and a part of my routine included playing softball. I love softball! I remember watching my dad play men’s softball. When he began to teach me to hit, throw, catch, and run bases, I was elated. My brother played little league baseball; so, there was never a shortage of having someone with whom to play catch. There are nine girls on a softball team. I was probably the shortest player in the DeBary league; but, that never deterred me. I worked just as hard, if not harder, than the other girls. I think deep down I always felt I had to prove my ability because of my size. Perhaps some of that persists today. For softball, I wore my hair in two braids, pigtails. Each year, I tried out for and made the team as starting second base. More often than not, other teams would purposely hit my way thinking I would be unable to field the ball. Many times they were proven wrong. I was equally as frustrating when it came to batting. The entire opposing team would take at least three to five steps inward believing I could not hit. Again, their strategy proved to be wrong because I could easily hit to any field and over the infield. Being a part of a team, at least for me, is an acceptance of skill level. Can you hit? Can you catch? Can you learn and are your willing to be taught and listen? Will you do what’s best for the team? Not everyone can be a star player. Often times being part of a team means performing a task outside of your comfort zone. I had to play first base for one game, even though I preferred and practiced for second base. It was what the team needed and the reward came when we won. Another lesson being a part of a softball team taught me was it was okay to ask why certain players were not pulling their weight. There is a right way and a wrong way to broach the subject. In addition to learning how to accept others, their skill sets, and assessing whether lesson could be learned, and answers to tough questions could be found, being a part of a team offers other opportunities for increased self-knowledge and improved communications.
          It was 1977 and I was a junior at DeLand Senior High School, I had hung up my softball glove and cleats and traded them for a leotard, tights, and ballet slippers. Talk about a 180! I had practiced and tried out to become a member of Avant Garde, the high school’s dance troop. Although we learned the individual steps for each dance, we came together during rehearsals by listening to our instructor and following the beat and count of the music. We were a successful girl’s dance team. There were distinct advantages with being a unisex team. Traveling was easy. Whenever we traveled to another school to perform, we could change in the same locker room, share the same bathroom stalls, if needed, share make-up, and interchange costumes. This recipe for success had worked for years; and, not just with the dance team. Our cheerleading squad consisted of only girls. My senior year brought a sudden and later welcomed change to the dance team.
           Our senior year show was based on the movie That’s Entertainment. I can still hear those songs as I remember all the rehearsing, the make-up, the costume changes, and all of the fun that comes with a high school performance. Our group has extended an invitation to the school’s choir group, The Modernaires. For the first time, and with limited appearances, boys would actually perform with Avant Garde. It took our performances to a new level. It opened the door for more and various types of choreography. Scenes with couples dancing could be incorporated. A boy could sing to a girl and have her respond with dance, or vice versa, as some of the Avant Garde members were also Modernaires. A new energy had been introduced to our group; and, ten years later when I returned for the ten year reunion of the Class of 1978, I was happy and proud to see that boys had become members, not just invited performers, of Avant Garde. Just as Andrew Stanton, the genius behind movies such as Finding Nemo and Wall-E explains in a presentation by TEDTalks (2012), “change is fundamental in stories”; and, I would argue, change is fundamental in groups, as static in groups will lead to the death of that group. It was the diversity introduced through the incorporation of boys to an all-girl dance troop that paved the way for it to not only become accepted; it became a standard, and ten years later, the group and its performances had grown because of the change.
          As I look back, I realize how those two snapshots stay with me to this day. Although I quite enjoy being short, I still find myself trying harder than others. That desire to succeed and be accepted by a team because of abilities drives me in much the same way. It taught me to accept others for their skills and willingness to help the team by learning, listening, and doing your best. My Avant Garde years expanded my views of all fill in the blank teams. I found that diversity adds to any group setting and keeps a team fresh. As Denning (2011) noted, stories such as these allow an audience to understand critical experiences that shaped who I am today and provide insight as to how I will act in certain, future circumstances. Had I simply stated, I am a team player, chances are my credibility would have had “no meaning” as these are words all too often (Whalen, 2007). However, a little self-disclosure, “clarifies and enlivens” while making and building exciting and intimate relationships (McKay et al., 2009, p. 24). 
References
Denning, S. (2011). The Leader’s Guide to Storytelling: Mastering the Art and Discipline of
            Business Narrative. San Francisco, CA. Jossey-Bass.
McKay, M., Davis, M., & Fanning, P. (2009). Messages: The Communication Skills Book.
            Oakland, CA. New Harbinger Publications, Inc.
TEDTalks. (2012, Mar. 21). Andrew Stanton: the clues to a great story. [Video file].
            Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxDwieKpawg
Whalen, D.J. (2007). The Professional Communications Toolkit. Thousand Oaks, CA. Sage
            Publications, Inc.
Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in Organizations. (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.